Changes between Version 21 and Version 22 of assign+

Timestamp:

Aug 7, 2013 3:55:29 PM (11 years ago)

Author:

sunshine

Comment:

--

assign+

@@ -72 +72 @@
 || Both ''assign'' and ''assign+'' succeeded || 300 || 3% || ''assign'' sometimes fails due to "luck". There is a good solution but it runs out of trials to find it. ||
 || ''assign'' succeeded, ''assign+'' failed || 4 || 0.04% || In one case there was a disconnected switch topology. In other 3 cases ''assign'' does not properly check for OS support and ends up assigning nodes that cannot load a requested OS. Thus effectively there were 0 cases in these tests where ''assign'' was better than ''assign+''. ||
-||  Both ''assign'' and ''assign+'' failed || 9,409 || 95/4% || n/a ||
+||  Both ''assign'' and ''assign+'' failed || 9,409 || 95.4% || n/a ||
 || ''assign'' failed, ''assign+'' succeeded, ''assign'' succeeded with fixed nodes from ''assign+'' || 147 || 1.49% || There is a good solution but ''assign'' cannot find it in a given number of trials. || 
 || ''assign'' failed, ''assign+'' succeeded, ''assign'' failed with fixed nodes from ''assign+'' || 1 || 0.01% || This happens because ''assign'' cannot properly deal with fixed interfaces. I checked quite a few of these solutions manually and they are possible solutions. ||